<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1d1 20130915//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta id="journal-meta-1">
      <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Innovative Journal</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Innovative Journal</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="journal_submission_guidelines">http://jmbas.in/index.php/jmbas</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Medical Biomedical and Applied Sciences</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <isbn></isbn>
      <issn publication-format="electronic"></issn>
      <issn publication-format="print">2589-8779</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Innovative Journal</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta id="article-meta-1">
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id"></article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.15520/jcmro.v2i10.214</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="pmid"></article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title id="at-0775b8d398c9">Retrospective Dosimetric Analysis of Bone Marrow Sparing vs Non Bone Marrow Sparing Image Guided Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Intact Carcinoma Cervix Patients</article-title>
        <subtitle></subtitle>
        <trans-title-group>
          <trans-title></trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib id="c-57b26b79fc45" corresp="yes">
          <name id="n-af751f97f347">
            <surname>Chigurupalli</surname>
            <given-names>Kiran</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>kiran.doc2010@gmail.com</email>
          <xref id="x-f45d014466cd" rid="a-064e19b5be55" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib id="c-69c8616f178d">
          <name id="n-5023116e43d4">
            <surname>Vashistha</surname>
            <given-names>Apoorv</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref id="x-5216b322a810" rid="a-e79ae8ae4379" ref-type="aff">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib id="c-2d1920e433a8">
          <name id="n-8932d3aa4abe">
            <surname>Patel</surname>
            <given-names>Deepanjali</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref id="x-476ac7de77c0" rid="a-5265358eaa3c" ref-type="aff">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib id="c-aead327f49d1">
          <name id="n-880c8ec60534">
            <surname>Purohit</surname>
            <given-names>Ramesh</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref id="x-3a99a9c82241" rid="a-93359a07c1d3" ref-type="aff">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib id="c-9a4adb52f4e9">
          <name id="n-ca7ca3a1cd15">
            <surname>Peter</surname>
            <given-names>Shalu</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref id="x-3b0a957660ae" rid="a-646d2f429ad6" ref-type="aff">5</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib id="c-aeefcc9237a4">
          <name id="n-5c7036de8441">
            <surname>Bhandari</surname>
            <given-names>Menal</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref id="x-c542623a85f0" rid="a-ffe826f2017b" ref-type="aff">6</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="a-064e19b5be55">
          <institution>Assistant Professor ,M.D Radio Therapy, Affliated To Geetnajali University &amp; Geetanjali Cancer Center  </institution>
          <addr-line></addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="a-e79ae8ae4379">
          <institution>Medical Physicist, M.Sc Physics, Affiliated To Geetnajali University &amp; Geetanjali Cancer Center  - Co- Author </institution>
          <addr-line></addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="a-5265358eaa3c">
          <institution>Junior Resident , M.B.B.S, Affiliated To Geetnajali University &amp; Geetanjali Cancer Center</institution>
          <addr-line></addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="a-93359a07c1d3">
          <institution>Assistant Professor, M.D Radio Therapy, Affiliated To Geetnajali University &amp; Geetanjali Cancer Center</institution>
          <addr-line></addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="a-646d2f429ad6">
          <institution>Medical Physicist, M.Sc Radiation Physics, Affiliated To Geetnajali University &amp; Geetanjali Cancer Center</institution>
          <addr-line></addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="a-ffe826f2017b">
          <institution>Assistant Professor, M.D Radio Therapy, Affiliated To Geetnajali University &amp; Geetanjali Cancer Center</institution>
          <addr-line></addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <volume>02</volume>
      <issue>10</issue>
      <fpage></fpage>
      <lpage></lpage>
      <page-range></page-range>
      <elocation-id></elocation-id>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement></copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      </permissions>
      <funding-group>
        <funding-statement></funding-statement>
      </funding-group>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict">
          <p></p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date>
        <day>11</day>
        <month>10</month>
        <year>2019</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract id="abstract-470f01bd41bb">
        <title id="abstract-title-e7e082b76917">Abstract:</title>
        <p id="t-05911457f00c"><bold id="strong-1">Aim: </bold>Aim of this study was to compare dosimetric parameters of bone marrow (BM) and non bone marrow sparing with state of the art technique image guided volumetric modulated arc therapy in the treatment of Carcinoma Cervix.</p>
        <p id="p-83710c491e8b"><bold id="strong-2">Methods and Materials:</bold> The retrospective Dosimetric study was conducted on 10 consecutive patients of biopsy-proven invasive cervical cancer attending the outpatient department of Geetanjali cancer centre. For treatment planning, patients were scanned on a GE Optima-520, 16 slice fan-beam CT (FBCT) scanner with 2.5 mm slice thickness in the supine position on a customized vacuum cushion with simulation tattoos and alignment lasers. All the simulation scans were taken after following a bladder and bowel preparation protocol, aimed at an empty rectum and full bladder, starting prior to the initial planning scan and continuing throughout the treatment. The prescribed dose to PTV was 50Gy in 25 fractions (2Gy/fraction) and from second week of radiotherapy 50mg/m<sup id="superscript-1">2</sup>/week cisplatin chemotherapy was administered for five weeks. Two sets of plans were generated for all the 10 patients using Volumetric Arc Radiotherapy (VMAT) in Monaco v 5.11.02(Elekta, Crawley, UK) treatment planning system. Keeping all constraints in mind planning optimization was performed with no compromise in coverage of PTV.</p>
        <p id="p-454cb365b604"><bold id="strong-3">Results</bold>: In the present study V5<sub id="subscript-1">, </sub> V10<sub id="subscript-2">, </sub> V20<sub id="subscript-3">, </sub> V30<sub id="subscript-4"> </sub> were all significantly lower in BMS-IG/VMAT plan . Maximum significance was noted at V20. Value of V40<sub id="subscript-5"> </sub> is lower in BM-IG/VMAT plan, but statistically not significant.</p>
        <p id="p-d51a91aa2d60"><bold id="strong-4">Conclusion:</bold> Treatment of carcinoma cervix is restricted as a result of toxicity of the surrounding normal structures and HT. HT could be significantly reduced by bone marrow sparing, which could be aided by IGRT/VMAT. This modality could allow completion of treatment with prescribed dose and concurrent chemotherapy in allotted stipulated time. More prospective randomized control trials are needed, to prove its efficacy.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group id="kwd-group-1">
        <title>Keywords</title>
        <kwd>Bone Marrow Sparing</kwd>
        <kwd>Hematological Toxicity</kwd>
        <kwd>Image Guidance/Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec>
      <title id="t-4898bcc486e6">Introduction:</title>
      <p id="t-ded5fa08e589">Prevalence of Cervical cancer is high in developing nations and it is estimated that close to 569,847 new cases and 311.356 deaths, related to carcinoma cervix were noted in 2018<xref id="x-cc495dadd29f" rid="R60294214046896" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>. Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is used as a standard treatment protocol. Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy has significantly improved tumor control, overall survival and progression free survival<xref id="x-7d0c9d54d904" rid="R60294214046938" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>. Many studies have reported that when the planned dose is delivered to the tumor using conventional techniques such as, 2D and 3DCRT, a larger volume of bone marrow is irradiated and higher dose is delivered to the exposed bone marrow[<xref rid="R60294214046939" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>,<xref rid="R60294214046940" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>. More than 50% of active bone marrow in adults is located in the pelvic and neighboring bones , which, when irradiated during the pelvic radiotherapy leads to decrease in the level of blood counts<xref id="x-5740c20ce377" rid="R60294214046939" ref-type="bibr">3</xref> . Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy to pelvis increases the hematological toxicity (HT) particularly leucopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. This Hematological Toxicity can cause uncalled interruption in the radiotherapy schedule or reduction in the no. of chemotherapy cycles scheduled. The fore mentioned problems results in reduced tumor control and accelerated tumor progression<xref id="x-7e092152409c" rid="R60294214046941" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>. As a result, sparing bone marrow as much as possible has become a priority in delivering precision RT<xref id="x-96af39adb00d" rid="R60294214046942" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>. Using IMRT/VMAT radiation doses can be delivered with high conformality, while avoiding nearby critical structures. The benefits of IMRT/VMAT were documented in head and neck cancer<xref rid="R60294214046943" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>,<xref rid="R60294214046944" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>, prostate cancer<xref rid="R60294214046939" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>,<xref rid="R60294214046945" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>. The results of RTOG 0418 phase II trial shown hematological toxicities can be associated with mean dose and higher dose irradiation volume of BM<xref id="x-b82b310cb184" rid="R60294214046946" ref-type="bibr">10</xref> [10].Few studies associated hematological toxicity with V<sub id="s-5e43906ed3eb">10Gy</sub>% and V<sub id="s-9f2f17cbcf18">20Gy</sub>%<xref rid="R60294214046947" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>,<xref rid="R60294214046948" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>. The usage of image guided volumetric modulated arc therapy technique (IG/VMAT) is on raise in recent times and its role is well established<xref id="x-9ffdf176841e" rid="R60294214046949" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>.Aim of the present study is to investigate Dose Volume Histogram parameters between state of the art technique IGRT/VMAT plan with and without bone marrow sparing and compare the results. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title id="t-033f9c30b362">Materials and Methods:</title>
      <p id="p-ae4803a91266"> The present study is a retrospective Dosimetric study conducted on 10 consecutive patients of biopsy-proven invasive cervical cancer attending the outpatient department of Geetanjali cancer centre, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India between January 2019 and April 2019. As per FIGO<xref id="x-793d78ba5872" rid="R60294214046950" ref-type="bibr">14</xref> two patients were IIB, two patients were IIIA, six patients were IIIB. For treatment planning, patients were scanned on a GE Optima-520, 16 slice fan-beam CT (FBCT) scanner with 2.5 mm slice thickness in the supine position on a customized vacuum cushion with simulation tattoos and alignment lasers. All the simulation scans were taken after following a bladder and bowel preparation protocol, aimed at an empty rectum and full bladder, starting prior to the initial planning scan and continuing throughout the treatment. The bowel preparation consists of a low bulk diet, and rectum voiding before treatment. The bladder preparation requires 1 litre of water to be consumed 30 min before planning scan and every treatment time. Fludicial markers were inserted into the vaginal cuff to visualize it on CT images. CT images were obtained from T12 to middle third of femur. Oral and intravenous contrast were administered to all the patients before acquiring CT images. </p>
      <p id="p-598617ad044f"> Gross Tumor volume (GTV) defined as gross tumor, its extent and positive lymph nodes as seen on the image. CTV was defined, based on the primary tumor extent and positive node involved with an additional margin for including microscopic spread. PTV was created from the CTV with an additional margin of 5-7 mm in all direction. Based on standard Radiation Therapy Oncology Group guidelines (RTOG)<xref rid="R60294214046951" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>,<xref rid="R60294214046952" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>,<xref rid="R60294214046953" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>. Organ at Risk included bladder, rectum, both femoral head, small bowel and the bone marrow . The low-density regions inside the bone were contoured by free hand as the surrogate for BM as demonstrated by Mahanshetty et al<xref id="x-8f8594d7ec02" rid="R60294214046954" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>. To bring uniformity the widow was adjusted to bone range while contouring the surrogate for bone marrow. All contouring was done by a single physician and verified by another physician for all plans, so that inter-observer variations could be eliminated. The cranial border of bone marrow contour began at 1 cm above the uppermost border of planning target volume (PTV) and ended at 1 cm below the lower border of the PTV. The rectum was outlined up to sigmoid flexure. The small bowel included the entire peritoneal cavity (not individual loops of bowel) up to L3. The prescribed dose to PTV was 50Gy in 25 fractions (2Gy/fraction) and from second week of radiotherapy 50mg/m<sup id="s-5dda8a1e5f43">2</sup>/week cisplatin chemotherapy was administered for five weeks. </p>
      <p id="p-a7ecbcfa82f5">Two sets of plans were generated for all the 10 patients using Volumetric Arc Radiotherapy (VMAT) in Monaco v 5.11.02(Elekta, Crawley, UK) treatment planning system , using Monte Carlo Algorithm using two full arcs.3mm grid space along with 5mm minimum segment width was used for all the plans. Keeping all constraints in mind planning optimization was performed with no compromise in coverage of PTV.</p>
      <p id="p-92e1db3a79aa">V95 of PTV received ≥ 95% of the prescribed dose in both Bone Marrow Sparing and Normal VMAT plan. Constraints for bowel bag V40 &lt; 30%, for rectum and bladder V40 &lt; 50-60% and for both femoral head V30 &lt; 20%. Constraints to bone marrow were V10 &lt; 90% and V 20 &lt; 75% of prescribed dose. </p>
      <p id="p-dcb5f1b5ef31"> Before treatment delivery CBCT scans were acquired in Elekta XVI with software version 5.0.2, using large volume scan protocol mode settings 120 kV, 80 mA, 28 mAs and acquisition angle range 360, maximum reconstruction diameter 40 cm, using the half-fan bowtie filter for Image Guided Radiotherapy during 25 fraction treatment course. Positional error, if any, were corrected and the prescribed dose was delivered.</p>
      <p id="p-ad793699bfb9">Dosimetric comparisons of plans were done based on the following parameters extracted from dose volume histogram (DVH): homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), V5, V10, V20, V30, V40 of pelvic bone marrow,V10, V20, V30, V40 of small bowel, V20, V30,V40 of bladder and V10, V20, V30, V40 of rectum. The HI was used to analyze the dose uniformity and defined as D5/D95. The lower the HI, the better the dose homogeneity. CI = the percentage of the PTV volume receiving at least 50 Gy × the ratio of the volume of the PTV receiving at least 50 Gy to the total 50 Gy volume. The closer the CI value was to 1, the better the dose conformity<xref id="x-07043a75ef68" rid="R60294214046955" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>.</p>
      <p id="p-6138e393ea62">SPSS software was used in analyzing the data (version 20.0,SPSS Inc, USA). Data was expressed in the form of mean ± standard deviation (χ ± s). Paired two-tailed students<italic id="emphasis-1"> t </italic> test was used to evaluate the significance of differences.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title id="t-c92a33cbf30f">Results:</title>
      <p id="p-2a7d036f9bc4">
        <bold id="s-aa5a6c1b0393"> Homogenisity index and conformity index of the PTV coverage</bold>
      </p>
      <table-wrap id="tw-fdb2416aba53" orientation="portrait" position="anchor">
        <label>Table 1</label>
        <caption id="c-9fa81711dfa6">
          <title id="t-ec879b296e7e"/>
        </caption>
        <table id="table-1" rules="rows">
          <colgroup/>
          <tbody id="table-section-1">
            <tr id="table-row-1">
              <td id="table-cell-1" align="left"></td>
              <td id="table-cell-2" align="left">BMS-IG/VMAT</td>
              <td id="table-cell-3" align="left">IG/VMAT</td>
              <td id="table-cell-4" align="left">t-VALUE</td>
              <td id="table-cell-5" align="left">P –VALUE</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-2">
              <td id="table-cell-6" align="left">HI</td>
              <td id="table-cell-7" align="left">1.0697±0.02737</td>
              <td id="table-cell-8" align="left">1.0685±0.02232</td>
              <td id="table-cell-9" align="left">-0.377</td>
              <td id="table-cell-10" align="left">0.715</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-3">
              <td id="table-cell-11" align="left">CI</td>
              <td id="table-cell-12" align="left">0.9765±0.02289</td>
              <td id="table-cell-13" align="left">0.9733±0.02354</td>
              <td id="table-cell-14" align="left">-1.316</td>
              <td id="table-cell-15" align="left">0.221</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="p-2665b44034ac">The values of HI and CI were mentioned in <xref id="x-a70f541365e7" rid="tw-fdb2416aba53" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>. the results revealed no statistical difference between HI and CI with bone marrowsparing and normal IG/VMAT</p>
      <p id="p-0eac00c686da">
        <bold id="s-fb74d3cbb4d6">Comparision of dosimetric parameters of OARs for two modalities</bold>
      </p>
      <p id="p-91d16d7752ee">Various doismetric parameters of bone marrow, small bowel, bladder, and rectum were described in the<xref id="x-e45f0611fe6a" rid="tw-1e71822540b0" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>. Statistical difference was seen V<sub id="s-ffac84773378">5, </sub> V<sub id="s-bd1f6b901cbd">10</sub>, V<sub id="s-41cdc3100222">20, </sub> V<sub id="s-4941c739d28d">30 </sub> pelvic bone marrow (<italic id="e-42dfdbfc8afd">P=0.006, P=0.001, P= 0.000, P=0.003).</italic> Irradiated Bone marrow volume was significantly reduced in both low and high dose areas by BMS-IG/VMAT technique. V<sub id="s-eed791617995">40 </sub> of bone marrow was not significant. No significance was noted in volume parameters of small bowel and bladder. For rectum, V<sub id="subscript-6">20 </sub> demonstrated notable significance between BM-IG/VMAT and IG/VMAT. The most possible explanation for the results in small bowel , bladder and rectum might be due to increase in irradiated volume of small bowel , bladder , rectum to achieve lower irradiated volume of pelvic bone marrow. </p>
      <table-wrap id="tw-1e71822540b0" orientation="portrait" position="anchor">
        <label>Table 2</label>
        <caption id="c-793a62afd6ab">
          <title id="t-6f60b2439aef"/>
        </caption>
        <table id="t-5a89587cfb32" rules="rows">
          <colgroup/>
          <tbody id="ts-c84670a3070a">
            <tr id="tr-dbac0cc3d8d1">
              <td id="tc-bd701c6c87d6" align="left">OAR</td>
              <td id="tc-40bf3cefb271" align="left">DOSIMETRIC PARAMETERS</td>
              <td id="tc-3cb6926d3043" align="left">BMS-IG/VMAT</td>
              <td id="tc-76121129ada5" align="left">IG/VMAT</td>
              <td id="tc-b93aab3d0d6f" align="left">t value</td>
              <td id="tc-a355411feb55" align="left">P value</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="tr-aafe63f47591">
              <td id="tc-164409ef990a" align="left">BM</td>
              <td id="tc-e1981aa9cad8" align="left">V5</td>
              <td id="tc-78981a447379" align="left">91.2280±7.13428</td>
              <td id="tc-3bede0155a85" align="left">93.6880±6.08795</td>
              <td id="tc-3ee29fdb6672" align="left">3.604</td>
              <td id="tc-331165b32a1e" align="left">.006</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="tr-4c9148061f92">
              <td id="tc-2583de9efb7f" align="left"></td>
              <td id="tc-37dd62aac559" align="left">V10</td>
              <td id="tc-8d17e49f76df" align="left">78.1100±8.08528</td>
              <td id="table-cell-16" align="left">85.4230±8.20678</td>
              <td id="table-cell-17" align="left">4.618</td>
              <td id="table-cell-18" align="left">.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-4">
              <td id="table-cell-19" align="left"></td>
              <td id="table-cell-20" align="left">V20</td>
              <td id="table-cell-21" align="left">65.9200±7.12604</td>
              <td id="table-cell-22" align="left">72.3970±7.27631</td>
              <td id="table-cell-23" align="left">5.923</td>
              <td id="table-cell-24" align="left">.000</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-5">
              <td id="table-cell-25" align="left"></td>
              <td id="table-cell-26" align="left">V30</td>
              <td id="table-cell-27" align="left">53.1480±7.26403</td>
              <td id="table-cell-28" align="left">57.5060±7.13710</td>
              <td id="table-cell-29" align="left">4.063</td>
              <td id="table-cell-30" align="left">.003</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-6">
              <td id="table-cell-31" align="left"></td>
              <td id="table-cell-32" align="left">V40</td>
              <td id="table-cell-33" align="left">35.5680±7.79528</td>
              <td id="table-cell-34" align="left">37.1360±7.77452</td>
              <td id="table-cell-35" align="left">1.760</td>
              <td id="table-cell-36" align="left">.112</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-7">
              <td id="table-cell-37" align="left">SMALL BOWEL</td>
              <td id="table-cell-38" align="left">V10</td>
              <td id="table-cell-39" align="left">86.9220±8.52063</td>
              <td id="table-cell-40" align="left">88.2370±7.65616</td>
              <td id="table-cell-41" align="left">1.0834</td>
              <td id="table-cell-42" align="left">.100</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-8">
              <td id="table-cell-43" align="left"></td>
              <td id="table-cell-44" align="left">V20</td>
              <td id="table-cell-45" align="left">63.8630±9.51192</td>
              <td id="table-cell-46" align="left">65.0630±8.63531</td>
              <td id="table-cell-47" align="left">0.55</td>
              <td id="table-cell-48" align="left">.596</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-9">
              <td id="table-cell-49" align="left"></td>
              <td id="table-cell-50" align="left">V30</td>
              <td id="table-cell-51" align="left">40.6630±11.71018</td>
              <td id="table-cell-52" align="left">38.5870±11.78525</td>
              <td id="table-cell-53" align="left">-1.147</td>
              <td id="table-cell-54" align="left">.281</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-10">
              <td id="table-cell-55" align="left"></td>
              <td id="table-cell-56" align="left">V40</td>
              <td id="table-cell-57" align="left">17.9270±7.58068</td>
              <td id="table-cell-58" align="left">16.4410±7.31540</td>
              <td id="table-cell-59" align="left">-1.328</td>
              <td id="table-cell-60" align="left">.217</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-11">
              <td id="table-cell-61" align="left">BLADDER</td>
              <td id="table-cell-62" align="left">V20</td>
              <td id="table-cell-63" align="left">99.1430±1.75260</td>
              <td id="table-cell-64" align="left">99.8800±0.28079</td>
              <td id="table-cell-65" align="left">1.283</td>
              <td id="table-cell-66" align="left">.232</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-12">
              <td id="table-cell-67" align="left"></td>
              <td id="table-cell-68" align="left">V30</td>
              <td id="table-cell-69" align="left">93.3480±7.66451</td>
              <td id="table-cell-70" align="left">92.6870±6.01752</td>
              <td id="table-cell-71" align="left">-0.752</td>
              <td id="table-cell-72" align="left">.471</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-13">
              <td id="table-cell-73" align="left"></td>
              <td id="table-cell-74" align="left">V40</td>
              <td id="table-cell-75" align="left">75.1530±12.74223</td>
              <td id="table-cell-76" align="left">74.5400±12.13383</td>
              <td id="table-cell-77" align="left">-1.385</td>
              <td id="table-cell-78" align="left">.199</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-14">
              <td id="table-cell-79" align="left">RECTUM</td>
              <td id="table-cell-80" align="left">V10</td>
              <td id="table-cell-81" align="left">97.2090±4.73948</td>
              <td id="table-cell-82" align="left">97.0530±4.95039</td>
              <td id="table-cell-83" align="left">-1.477</td>
              <td id="table-cell-84" align="left">.174</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-15">
              <td id="table-cell-85" align="left"></td>
              <td id="table-cell-86" align="left">V20</td>
              <td id="table-cell-87" align="left">95.9330±6.12140</td>
              <td id="table-cell-88" align="left">95.8050±6.2594</td>
              <td id="table-cell-89" align="left">-2.437</td>
              <td id="table-cell-90" align="left">.038</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-16">
              <td id="table-cell-91" align="left"></td>
              <td id="table-cell-92" align="left">V30</td>
              <td id="table-cell-93" align="left">94.0340±7.12564</td>
              <td id="table-cell-94" align="left">93.8030±7.03076</td>
              <td id="table-cell-95" align="left">-0.887</td>
              <td id="table-cell-96" align="left">.398</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-17">
              <td id="table-cell-97" align="left"></td>
              <td id="table-cell-98" align="left">V40</td>
              <td id="table-cell-99" align="left">82.9750±10.19145</td>
              <td id="table-cell-100" align="left">83.0550±9.89506</td>
              <td id="table-cell-101" align="left">0.151</td>
              <td id="table-cell-102" align="left">.883</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="paragraph-91"/>
      <fig id="f-2945be5e3da7" position="anchor" orientation="portrait" fig-type="graphic">
        <label>Figure 1 </label>
        <caption id="c-6acbec1fac9c">
          <title id="t-4a4dde398324"> Contured structure set</title>
        </caption>
        <graphic id="g-058a6fccea66" xlink:href="https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/b96285e3-4920-4e95-b0b0-f32c3f70065e/image/ee0f447b-7f5a-4996-9fd5-61202da80119-unew-picture-3.png"/>
      </fig>
      <p id="paragraph-92"> </p>
      <fig id="f-ec8f29dfe5c4" position="anchor" orientation="portrait" fig-type="graphic">
        <label>Figure 2 </label>
        <caption id="c-71fc57827954">
          <title id="t-b5d9e9d06425"> comparison of DVH of BMS-IG/VMAT and IG/VMAT</title>
        </caption>
        <graphic id="g-cba68349804f" xlink:href="https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/b96285e3-4920-4e95-b0b0-f32c3f70065e/image/65a77fd8-06c1-4dc3-9963-fe3107d8d3b9-unew-picture-4.png"/>
      </fig>
      <p id="p-c19d459a7892"/>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title id="t-4d3f7b0a495e"><bold id="s-ae3de45c90ef">Discussion:</bold> </title>
      <p id="t-9ea27f98180e">The purpose of our study was to compare bone marrow sparing IG/VMAT with normal IG/VMAT planning ,to reduce volume of irradiated pelvic bone marrow ,which could be an important contributing factor for acute bone marrow toxicity<xref rid="R60294214046939" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>,<xref rid="R60294214046948" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>,<xref rid="R60294214046951" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>.Concurrent chemotherapy with highly conformal radiotherapy has improved the survival rates, as well as increasing hematological toxicity<xref id="x-611afc070202" rid="R60294214046956" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>. Prolonged treatment duration due to interruption caused by ≥ grade 2 hematological toxicity , will have negative impact on overall survival and also local control<xref rid="R60294214046957" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>,<xref rid="R60294214046958" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>,<xref rid="R60294214046959" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>. Results of Rose BS et al., showed that grade 3 neutropenia is high , if the volume of PBM (pelvic bone marrow) receiving 10 Gy is &gt;95% than in those patients in whom &lt;95% of the PBM received this dose (63.8% vs 24.6%; p&lt;0.001)<xref id="x-a1521e1e0052" rid="R60294214046960" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>. Albuquerque K reported that grade ≥2 HT can be strongly predicted by volume of PBM receiving 20 Gy. The risk of HT increased by a factor of 4.5 when &gt;80% of PBM received 20 Gy<xref rid="R60294214046951" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>,<xref rid="R60294214046961" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>. In the present study V5<sub id="s-f0445f3a39b6">, </sub> V10<sub id="s-2cb75791c149">, </sub> V20<sub id="s-854347af4252">, </sub> V30<sub id="s-7263177d9e86"> </sub> were all significantly lower in BMS-IG/VMAT plan . Maximum significance was noted at V<sub id="s-bbeaa2093a35">20</sub>. Value of V40<sub id="s-1207b40d8432"> </sub> is lower in BM-IG/VMAT plan, but statistically not significant. RTOG 0418 trial described that ≥ grade 2 HT is more if the volume of PBM receiving 40 Gy is &gt;37% (p=0.04)<xref id="x-cc7374a627ab" rid="R60294214046946" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>. Although the constraints were not achieved in the present study, the mean values of all volumes were significantly less. This could be due to not including femoral heads in the bone marrow; as a result the absolute value of pelvic bone marrow is decreased. Rest of the studies included femoral heads in the volume of pelvic bone marrow. Other possible reason could be that we conducted this dosimetric analysis on intact cervical patients wherein generous PTV was considered. All our patients received 50 Gy in 25 fractions and rest of the studies 45Gy in 25 fractions was delivered. Major limitation of our study was that the constraints given to the bladder and rectum (V40≤40-60%) were not met. As majority of rectum and bladder volume was lying within the PTV. RTOG 0418<xref id="x-fe9b3ff95d70" rid="R60294214046946" ref-type="bibr">10</xref> [10] described in patients of endometrial carcinoma the constraints given to bladder and rectum of V45 ≤35% and V45 ≤60% were achieved in only 33.3% and 22.8% respectively. By analyzing the current data, we concluded that the constraints given were unrealistic. RTOG 0418 study suggested that new trials should try to liberalize the dose constraints to a certain level<xref id="x-9687c552ae11" rid="R60294214046946" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>. Study by Mell LK et al., BMS-IMRT with conventional radiotherapy techniques in seven intact cervical cancer patients revealed that, V40 of bladder and rectum was 73.6% and 83.7% respectively<xref id="x-b935e7cdfb0e" rid="R60294214046946" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>.</p>
      <p id="p-6a1d0fac6148">Another unclear issue is , to what extent the degree of sparing is necessary for significant reduction in toxicity. Limiting low-dose radiation to normal tissue is difficult with conventional planning margins and current algorithms even after using modern modalities like IGRT/VMAT technique. it would be advisable to reduce the planning margins to improve bone marrow-sparing using these techniques. organ motion is a significant problem, which needs to be better understood and also quantified. study By Krishnan et al , showed the sparing of bone marrow with VMAT at different dose and volume level was much better than IMRT In other words, IGRT/VMAT technique could be used as a better tool to permit safe reduction in the planning margins that could improve bone marrow-sparing . </p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title id="t-e83f3a2b3b46">
        <bold id="s-27cbb16629bf">Conclusion:</bold>
      </title>
      <p id="p-65f1a504399d"> Treatment of carcinoma cervix is restricted as a result of toxicity of the surrounding normal structures and HT. HT could be significantly reduced by bone marrow sparing, which could be aided by IGRT/VMAT. This modality could allow completion of treatment with prescribed dose and concurrent chemotherapy in allotted stipulated time. More prospective randomized control trials are needed, to prove its efficacy.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="R60294214046896">
        <element-citation publication-type="misc">
          <source>Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries</source>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046938">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Green</surname>
              <given-names>J A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kirwan</surname>
              <given-names/>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Tierney</surname>
              <given-names>J F</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>
          <source>Lancet</source>
          <year>2001</year>
          <volume>358</volume>
          <fpage>781</fpage>
          <lpage>786</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046939">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Kochanski Jd Roeske</surname>
              <given-names>J C</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Dosimetric predictors of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy</article-title>
          <source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source>
          <year>2006</year>
          <volume>66</volume>
          <fpage>1356</fpage>
          <lpage>1365</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046940">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <article-title>Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials</article-title>
          <source>J Clin Oncol</source>
          <year>2008</year>
          <volume>26</volume>
          <fpage>5802</fpage>
          <lpage>5812</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046941">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <article-title>Treatment resistance of solid tumors: role of hypoxia and anemia</article-title>
          <source>P Thews O Hoeckel M</source>
          <year>2001</year>
          <volume>18</volume>
          <fpage>243</fpage>
          <lpage>259</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046942">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Lk</surname>
              <given-names/>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Tiryaki</surname>
              <given-names>H</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ahn</surname>
              <given-names>K H</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer</article-title>
          <source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source>
          <year>2008</year>
          <volume>71</volume>
          <fpage>1504</fpage>
          <lpage>1510</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046943">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Graff</surname>
              <given-names>I</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Serre</surname>
              <given-names>P</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Boisselier</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bensadoun</surname>
              <given-names>P</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Ortholan</surname>
              <given-names>R J</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>.</surname>
              <given-names>C</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: Results of the prospective study GORTEC 2004-03</article-title>
          <source>Radiotherapy and Oncology</source>
          <year>2012</year>
          <volume>103</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>57</fpage>
          <lpage>62</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046944">
        <element-citation publication-type="misc">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Nutting</surname>
              <given-names>C M</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Morden</surname>
              <given-names>J P</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Harrington</surname>
              <given-names>K J</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Urbano</surname>
              <given-names>T G</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bhide</surname>
              <given-names>S A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Clark</surname>
              <given-names>C</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <source>Parotid-sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): A phase 3 multicentre randomized controlled trial. The Lancet Oncology</source>
          <year>2011</year>
          <volume>12</volume>
          <fpage>127</fpage>
          <lpage>163</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046945">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Zelefsky</surname>
              <given-names>M J</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kollmeier</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Cox</surname>
              <given-names>B</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Fidaleo</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Sperling</surname>
              <given-names>D</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Pei</surname>
              <given-names>X</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Improved clinical outcomes with high-dose image-guided radiotherapy compared with non-IGRT for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer</article-title>
          <source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source>
          <year>2012</year>
          <volume>84</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>125</fpage>
          <lpage>154</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046946">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Klopp</surname>
              <given-names>A H</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Moughan</surname>
              <given-names/>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Portelance</surname>
              <given-names>L</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Hematologic toxicity in RTOG 0418: a phase 2 study of postoperative IMRT for gynecologic cancer</article-title>
          <source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source>
          <year>2013</year>
          <volume>86</volume>
          <fpage>83</fpage>
          <lpage>90</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046947">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Lhomme´ C Fumoleau P Fargeot</surname>
              <given-names>P</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Results of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Early Clinical Studies Group phase II trial of first-line irinotecan in patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix</article-title>
          <source>J Clin Oncol</source>
          <year>1999</year>
          <volume>17</volume>
          <fpage>3136</fpage>
          <lpage>3142</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046948">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Mell</surname>
              <given-names>L K</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Schomas</surname>
              <given-names/>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Salama</surname>
              <given-names>J K</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Association between bone marrow dosimetric parameters and acute hematologic toxicity in anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy</article-title>
          <source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source>
          <year>2008</year>
          <volume>70</volume>
          <fpage>1431</fpage>
          <lpage>1437</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046949">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="editor">
            <name>
              <surname>.</surname>
              <given-names>13. Irfan Ahmad Kundan Singh Chufal et al.Early</given-names>
            </name>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Clinical Outcomes, Patterns of Failure, and Acute Haematologic Toxicity of Image-Guided Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (IG-VMAT) in the Definitive Treatment of Locally Advanced Carcinoma Cervix</article-title>
          <source>Clinical Medicine Insights Oncology</source>
          <year>2018</year>
          <volume>12</volume>
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          <lpage>10</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046950">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <article-title>FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and corpus uteri</article-title>
          <source>Committee on Gynecologic Oncology</source>
          <year>2014</year>
          <volume>125</volume>
          <fpage>97</fpage>
          <lpage>98</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046951">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Albuquerque</surname>
              <given-names>K</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Giangreco D Morrison</surname>
              <given-names>C</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Radiation-related predictors of hematologic toxicity after concurrent chemoradiation for cervical cancer and implications for bone marrowYsparing pelvic IMRT</article-title>
          <source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source>
          <year>2011</year>
          <volume>79</volume>
          <fpage>1043</fpage>
          <lpage>1047</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046952">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Small</surname>
              <given-names>W</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Mell</surname>
              <given-names>L K</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Anderson</surname>
              <given-names>P</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Creutzberg</surname>
              <given-names>C De Los</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Santos</surname>
              <given-names/>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gaffney</surname>
              <given-names>D</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Consensus guidelines for delineation of clinical target volume for intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy in postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer</article-title>
          <source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source>
          <year>2008</year>
          <volume>71</volume>
          <fpage>428</fpage>
          <lpage>462</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046953">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Lim</surname>
              <given-names>K</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Small</surname>
              <given-names/>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Portelance</surname>
              <given-names>L</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Creutzberg</surname>
              <given-names>C Jürgenliemk-Schulz Im</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Mundt</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Consensus guidelines for delineation of clinical target volume for intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy for the definitive treatment of cervix cancer</article-title>
          <source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source>
          <year>2011</year>
          <volume>79</volume>
          <fpage>348</fpage>
          <lpage>55</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046954">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Mahantshetty</surname>
              <given-names>U</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Krishnatry</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Chaudhari</surname>
              <given-names>S</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Kanaujia</surname>
              <given-names>A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Engineer</surname>
              <given-names>R</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Chopra</surname>
              <given-names>S</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Shrivastava</surname>
              <given-names>S</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Comparison of 2 contouring methods of bone marrow on CT and correlation with hematological toxicities in non-bone marrow-sparing pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin for cervical cancer</article-title>
          <source>Int J Gynecol Cancer</source>
          <year>2012</year>
          <volume>22</volume>
          <fpage>1427</fpage>
          <lpage>1434</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046955">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Weiss</surname>
              <given-names>E</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Siebers</surname>
              <given-names>J V</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Keall</surname>
              <given-names>P J</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>An analysis of 6-MV versus 18-MV photon energy plans for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of lung cancer</article-title>
          <source>Radiother Oncol</source>
          <year>2007</year>
          <volume>82</volume>
          <fpage>55</fpage>
          <lpage>62</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046956">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Rose</surname>
              <given-names>P G</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bundy</surname>
              <given-names>B N</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Watkins</surname>
              <given-names>E B</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Thigpen</surname>
              <given-names>J T</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Deppe</surname>
              <given-names>G</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Maiman</surname>
              <given-names>M A</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer</article-title>
          <source>N Engl J Med</source>
          <year>1999</year>
          <volume>340</volume>
          <issue>15</issue>
          <fpage>1144</fpage>
          <lpage>53</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046957">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Parker</surname>
              <given-names>K</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Gallop-Evans</surname>
              <given-names>E</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hanna</surname>
              <given-names>L</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Adams</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Five years’ experience treating locally advanced cervical cancer with concurrent chemoradiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy: results from a single institution</article-title>
          <source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source>
          <year>2009</year>
          <volume>74</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>140</fpage>
          <lpage>186</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046958">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Lanciano</surname>
              <given-names>R M</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Pajak</surname>
              <given-names>T F</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Martz</surname>
              <given-names>K</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hanks</surname>
              <given-names>G E</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>The influence of treatment time on an outcome for squamous cell cancer of the uterine cervix treated with radiation: A patterns-of-care study</article-title>
          <source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source>
          <year>1993</year>
          <volume>25</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>391</fpage>
          <lpage>97</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046959">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Perez</surname>
              <given-names>C A</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Grigsby</surname>
              <given-names>P W</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Castro-Vita</surname>
              <given-names>H</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Lockett</surname>
              <given-names>M A</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Carcinoma of the uterine cervix. I. Impact of prolongation of overall treatment time and timing of brachytherapy on the outcome of radiation therapy</article-title>
          <source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source>
          <year>1995</year>
          <volume>32</volume>
          <issue>5</issue>
          <fpage>1275</fpage>
          <lpage>88</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046960">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Rose</surname>
              <given-names/>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Bs</surname>
              <given-names/>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Aydogan</surname>
              <given-names>B</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Liang</surname>
              <given-names>Y</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Yeginer</surname>
              <given-names>M</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Hasselle</surname>
              <given-names>M D</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Dandekar</surname>
              <given-names>V</given-names>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Normal tissue complication probability modeling of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy</article-title>
          <source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source>
          <year>2011</year>
          <volume>79</volume>
          <issue>3</issue>
          <fpage>800</fpage>
          <lpage>807</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R60294214046961">
        <element-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name>
              <surname>Krishnan Jayarama Shetty</surname>
              <given-names>Suresh</given-names>
            </name>
            <name>
              <surname>Rao</surname>
              <given-names/>
            </name>
            <collab/>
          </person-group>
          <article-title>Dosimetric Advantage of VMAT Technique in Bone Marrow Sparing Than IMRT in Treatment of Cervical Cancer</article-title>
          <source>International Journal of Health Sciences &amp; Research</source>
          <year>2017</year>
          <issue>7</issue>
          <fpage>102</fpage>
          <lpage>111</lpage>
        </element-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
